AG REPORT

? Audit Shock: Only 8 Out of 47 County Assemblies Get a Clean Report!

A recent audit report by the Auditor-General has raised serious concerns about financial management practices in Kenya’s County Assemblies. Out of 47 audited assemblies, only 8 received a clean report, while the rest were flagged for various financial irregularities.

Here’s a breakdown of what the Auditor-General uncovered:

  1. Financial Misstatements: 39 County Assemblies were found to have significant financial misstatements.
  2. Unsupported Expenses: Garissa County Assembly could not account for KES. 248 million in expenses.
  3. Outstanding Bills: Tana River County Assembly had KES. 166 million in pending bills—some dating as far back as the 2014/15 financial year!
  4. Ethnic Imbalance: Over 60% of staff in several counties came from a single ethnic group, a violation of the National Cohesion and Integration Act.
  5. Unapproved Cash Payments: KES. 26 million was disbursed in cash outside the IFMIS system in Wajir County Assembly.

Why Should This Matter to You?

  • Poor financial management directly translates to poor service delivery—funds meant for roads, hospitals, and schools are being misused.
  • Financial mismanagement undermines public trust and hinders development.

Is your county among the 8 clean ones? Check the report here.

At JMK Advocates LLP, we specialize in Governance, Compliance, and Advisory Services. If you need guidance on compliance, audit responses, or strategies to enhance transparency and accountability in public finance management, our team is ready to help.

? Contact us today to ensure your institution stays on the right side of the law!

judgement

Landmark Ruling on Competing Land Titles & Fraudulent Acquisitions ?

In Civil Appeal No. E789 of 2023, Mas Construction Limited and 7 others [2023] the Court of Appeal reaffirmed a critical principle in land ownership disputes: the first title in time prevails, and a mere certificate of title is not enough—the root of title must be proven.

Key Takeaways:

Authenticity of Title: The Abduls’ ownership of LR No. 209/1916/5 (Grant No. 94707) dates back to 1937, while the Appellant’s title (IR 147524, issued in 2013) was fraudulently obtained.


Proper Title Issuance vs. Fraudulent Claims: Ownership must follow the correct sequence:
First: A letter of allotment is issued.
Second: A Deed Plan is prepared.
Third: A Grant is registered.
The Abduls followed this process, with their letter of allotment dated 21st July 2003, leading to Deed Plan No. 244601 and Grant No. 94707 issued in 2004.


Fraud Uncovered: The Appellant’s claim was built on a falsified affidavit by the 3rd respondent, who falsely declared that Deed Plan No. 244601 had been lost. This deception enabled them to obtain a certified copy, which was then used to create a parallel grant (IR 147524)—despite IR 94707 already existing.


Critical Evidence: The original Deed File for IR 94707 mysteriously disappeared at the Lands Registry in 2013, further pointing to collusion.

Legal Precedent: Relying on Presbyterian Foundation v Kibera Siranga Self-Help Group Nursery School [2023], the Court emphasized that a good root of title must be traceable, have a recognizable description, and must not cast doubts.
Final Ruling: The Court declared the Appellant’s title null and void ab initio, awarded Kshs. 10 million in damages for trespass and demolition, and issued permanent injunctions against further interference.

Shareholder Agreements_ Why Every Business Partnership Needs One

Shareholder Agreements: Why Every Business Partnership Needs One

Introduction

Starting a business with partners is an exciting venture, but without a well-drafted shareholder agreement, disputes and misunderstandings can arise, potentially jeopardizing the company’s success. A shareholder agreement is a legally binding contract among a company’s shareholders that outlines their rights, responsibilities, and obligations. This document is crucial in ensuring smooth operations and protecting the interests of all stakeholders.

What is a Shareholder Agreement?

A shareholder agreement is a contract among the shareholders of a company that regulates their relationship, ownership rights, management responsibilities, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Unlike the company’s Articles of Association, which are publicly available, a shareholder agreement is a private document tailored to the specific needs of the shareholders.

Key Components of a Shareholder Agreement

To be effective, a shareholder agreement should address the following essential elements:

1. Ownership Structure and Share Allocation

  • Clearly defines the percentage of ownership each shareholder holds.
  • Specifies the issuance of new shares and procedures for dilution.

2. Decision-Making and Voting Rights

  • Outlines how major business decisions will be made.
  • Defines voting rights and quorum requirements.
  • Establishes special resolutions for critical decisions such as mergers, acquisitions, or major expenditures.

3. Roles and Responsibilities of Shareholders

  • Defines the involvement of each shareholder in daily operations.
  • Clarifies decision-making authority and management roles.

4. Restrictions on Transfer of Shares

  • Implements pre-emptive rights to allow existing shareholders the first option to buy shares before selling to external parties.
  • Establishes procedures for voluntary and involuntary transfer of shares, including death, bankruptcy, or incapacity of a shareholder.

5. Exit Strategies

  • Defines buyout options, including valuation methods and payment terms.
  • Establishes mechanisms for resolving deadlocks among shareholders.
  • Provides for drag-along and tag-along rights to protect minority and majority shareholders in sale transactions.

6. Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

  • Includes procedures for mediation, arbitration, or litigation in case of disputes.
  • Helps prevent costly and time-consuming legal battles.

7. Confidentiality and Non-Compete Clauses

  • Prevents shareholders from disclosing sensitive business information.
  • Restricts shareholders from engaging in competing businesses during and after their involvement in the company.

8. Dividend Policies and Financial Management

  • Outlines how and when dividends will be distributed to shareholders.
  • Specifies financial reporting requirements and audit processes.

Why Every Business Partnership Needs a Shareholder Agreement

A shareholder agreement is vital for various reasons, including:

1. Prevents Future Disputes

By outlining roles, responsibilities, and dispute resolution mechanisms, a shareholder agreement reduces the likelihood of disagreements among shareholders.

2. Protects Minority Shareholders

The agreement ensures that minority shareholders have a say in significant business decisions, preventing majority shareholders from making unilateral decisions that could be detrimental to them.

3. Provides Clarity on Exit Strategies

Business circumstances change over time, and a well-structured agreement provides clear guidelines on how shareholders can exit the company without disrupting operations.

4. Ensures Business Continuity

In case of the death, incapacity, or departure of a shareholder, the agreement provides a roadmap for succession planning and ownership transition, preventing operational disruptions.

5. Establishes a Framework for Growth

The agreement ensures that the business has a structured plan for raising capital, issuing new shares, and managing financial resources effectively, facilitating long-term growth.

Conclusion

A shareholder agreement is an indispensable tool for any business partnership. It fosters transparency, prevents conflicts, and safeguards the interests of all shareholders. Whether you are starting a new venture or already operating a business with multiple shareholders, having a well-drafted shareholder agreement is a proactive step toward ensuring stability and long-term success. Seeking legal expertise to tailor the agreement to your specific needs is essential in protecting your business and investment.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)_ Why Businesses Should Consider It Over Litigation (in detail)

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Why Businesses Should Consider It Over Litigation (in detail)

Introduction

Disputes are an inevitable part of business operations, arising from contractual disagreements, employee relations, or commercial transactions. Traditionally, businesses have relied on litigation to resolve conflicts. However, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is increasingly becoming the preferred method due to its efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and ability to preserve business relationships. This guide explores ADR, its advantages over litigation, and why businesses should consider it as a primary dispute resolution mechanism.

Understanding Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

What is ADR?

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a set of techniques used to resolve disputes outside the traditional courtroom setting. It includes mediation, arbitration, negotiation, and conciliation. ADR focuses on finding amicable solutions tailored to the interests of all parties involved.

Key Forms of ADR

  1. Mediation – A neutral third party (mediator) facilitates discussions between disputing parties, guiding them toward a mutually acceptable resolution. The mediator does not impose a decision but encourages constructive dialogue.
  2. Arbitration – A neutral arbitrator hears arguments and evidence from both sides and issues a binding or non-binding decision. Arbitration is often preferred for its efficiency and enforceability.
  3. Negotiation – Direct discussions between parties to settle disputes without third-party involvement. It is the simplest and most informal ADR method.
  4. Conciliation – Similar to mediation, but the conciliator plays a more active role in proposing solutions and facilitating agreement between parties.

Why Businesses Should Consider ADR Over Litigation

1. Cost-Effectiveness

Litigation is expensive due to attorney fees, court costs, and administrative expenses. ADR significantly reduces these costs by shortening the dispute resolution timeline and avoiding prolonged legal battles.

2. Time Efficiency

Court cases can take months or even years to resolve due to legal complexities and judicial backlogs. ADR offers a faster resolution, allowing businesses to focus on their core operations without prolonged distractions.

3. Confidentiality and Privacy

Unlike litigation, which is conducted in open court, ADR proceedings are private. This confidentiality protects business reputations and sensitive information from public exposure.

4. Flexibility and Control

ADR allows parties to tailor the dispute resolution process to their specific needs. They can choose the mediator, arbitrator, and procedural rules, unlike litigation, which follows rigid court procedures.

5. Preservation of Business Relationships

Litigation is adversarial, often damaging business relationships beyond repair. ADR fosters cooperative problem-solving, increasing the likelihood of maintaining long-term partnerships.

6. Enforceability of Decisions

Arbitration awards are legally binding and enforceable in many jurisdictions, providing certainty and closure to disputes without the need for lengthy appeals.

How ADR Benefits Different Business Sectors

1. Commercial Transactions

Businesses engaged in contracts, sales agreements, or service provisions can use ADR to resolve disputes efficiently, avoiding costly litigation that could delay business operations.

2. Employment and Labor Relations

ADR is effective in resolving workplace conflicts, such as wrongful termination, discrimination, or wage disputes, fostering a positive work environment while reducing legal expenses.

3. Construction and Real Estate

Disputes in construction projects and property transactions often involve multiple stakeholders. ADR helps parties reach fair resolutions without stalling projects or incurring heavy legal costs.

4. International Trade and Investments

Cross-border disputes require neutral resolution mechanisms. International arbitration, a widely accepted ADR method, ensures impartiality and enforceability of decisions across different legal jurisdictions.

Steps to Implement ADR in Business Disputes

1. Include ADR Clauses in Contracts

Businesses should incorporate ADR clauses in contracts, specifying mediation or arbitration as the preferred dispute resolution method. This ensures that disputes are handled efficiently without resorting to litigation.

2. Engage Qualified ADR Professionals

Working with experienced mediators, arbitrators, or ADR institutions enhances the credibility and effectiveness of the dispute resolution process.

3. Educate Employees and Stakeholders

Businesses should train employees and stakeholders on ADR benefits and procedures, fostering a culture of amicable dispute resolution.

4. Choose the Right ADR Method

The choice of ADR method depends on the nature of the dispute, the relationship between parties, and the desired outcome. Businesses should evaluate their needs before selecting mediation, arbitration, negotiation, or conciliation.

Challenges and Considerations in ADR

1. Enforcement of Non-Binding Agreements

While arbitration decisions are legally binding, mediation and negotiation agreements may require additional legal enforcement mechanisms.

2. Power Imbalances

In some cases, one party may have more influence over the ADR process, potentially leading to unfair outcomes. Choosing neutral, well-qualified ADR professionals mitigates this risk.

3. Limited Appeal Options

Arbitration awards are final and have limited appeal options compared to court decisions. Businesses should carefully assess the risks before agreeing to binding arbitration.

4. Legal Recognition of ADR Agreements

While many jurisdictions recognize ADR agreements, businesses must ensure compliance with local laws to guarantee enforceability.

Conclusion

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers businesses a practical, efficient, and cost-effective way to resolve disputes while preserving relationships and protecting confidentiality. By embracing ADR, businesses can avoid the financial and reputational risks associated with litigation. Implementing ADR strategies, such as including ADR clauses in contracts and engaging qualified professionals, ensures smoother dispute resolution processes. As business environments evolve, ADR remains a valuable tool for fostering cooperative problem-solving and long-term success.